Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild rice vs Adaptogenic Tea

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild rice

Wild rice

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Adaptogenic Tea

Adaptogenic Tea

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
160 kcal
Energy
12.7 kcal
1g
Sugars
3.4g
0g
Fat
0g
13.3g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild rice and Adaptogenic Tea side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild rice is the more energy-dense option here, packing 147 more calories per 100g than Adaptogenic Tea. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Wild rice takes the lead with only 1g of sugar per 100g, whereas Adaptogenic Tea contains 3.3826638477801g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wild rice offers a protein boost with 13.3333g per 100g, outperforming Adaptogenic Tea in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild rice or Adaptogenic Tea?

It depends on your goals. Wild rice has 160 calories, while Adaptogenic Tea has 12.684989429175 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild rice vegan?

No, Wild rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild rice and Adaptogenic Tea?

There is a difference of 147 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.