Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Skipjack Tuna vs Chunk light tuna in water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild Skipjack Tuna

Wild Skipjack Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chunk light tuna in water

Chunk light tuna in water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
98.6 kcal
Energy
70.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.1g
Fat
1.1g
22.5g
Protein
14.1g
0.8g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Skipjack Tuna and Chunk light tuna in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Skipjack Tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 28 more calories per 100g than Chunk light tuna in water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Skipjack Tuna offers a protein boost with 22.5g per 100g, outperforming Chunk light tuna in water in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Skipjack Tuna or Chunk light tuna in water?

It depends on your goals. Wild Skipjack Tuna has 98.6 calories, while Chunk light tuna in water has 70.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Skipjack Tuna vegan?

No, Wild Skipjack Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Skipjack Tuna and Chunk light tuna in water?

There is a difference of 28 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.