Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Skipjack Tuna vs Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Skipjack Tuna

Wild Skipjack Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon

Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
223 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.2g
Fat
6.4g
23.5g
Protein
38.3g
0.6g
Salt
5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Skipjack Tuna and Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Skipjack Tuna is the clear winner. With 117 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Skipjack Tuna or Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Wild Skipjack Tuna has 106 calories, while Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon has 223 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Skipjack Tuna vegan?

No, Wild Skipjack Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Skipjack Tuna and Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon?

There is a difference of 117 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.