Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Skipjack Tuna vs Tilapia Skinless Fillets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild Skipjack Tuna

Wild Skipjack Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tilapia Skinless Fillets

Tilapia Skinless Fillets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
80.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.2g
Fat
1.8g
23.5g
Protein
17.9g
0.6g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Skipjack Tuna and Tilapia Skinless Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Skipjack Tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 26 more calories per 100g than Tilapia Skinless Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Skipjack Tuna offers a protein boost with 23.5g per 100g, outperforming Tilapia Skinless Fillets in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Skipjack Tuna or Tilapia Skinless Fillets?

It depends on your goals. Wild Skipjack Tuna has 106 calories, while Tilapia Skinless Fillets has 80.3571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Skipjack Tuna vegan?

No, Wild Skipjack Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Skipjack Tuna and Tilapia Skinless Fillets?

There is a difference of 26 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.