Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Skipjack Tuna vs Wild Caught Light Tuna in Spring Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild Skipjack Tuna

Wild Skipjack Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild Caught Light Tuna in Spring Water

Wild Caught Light Tuna in Spring Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.2g
Fat
0g
23.5g
Protein
24.3g
0.6g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Skipjack Tuna and Wild Caught Light Tuna in Spring Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Skipjack Tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 6 more calories per 100g than Wild Caught Light Tuna in Spring Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Skipjack Tuna or Wild Caught Light Tuna in Spring Water?

It depends on your goals. Wild Skipjack Tuna has 106 calories, while Wild Caught Light Tuna in Spring Water has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Skipjack Tuna vegan?

No, Wild Skipjack Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Skipjack Tuna and Wild Caught Light Tuna in Spring Water?

There is a difference of 6 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.