Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad vs Chili Mac
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad
Chili Mac
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad and Chili Mac side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad is the more energy-dense option here, packing 89 more calories per 100g than Chili Mac. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad takes the lead with only 1.88g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chili Mac contains 3.12g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Chili Mac in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad or Chili Mac?
It depends on your goals. Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad has 181 calories, while Chili Mac has 91.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad vegan?
No, Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad and Chili Mac?
There is a difference of 89 calories per 100g between the two products.
