Head-to-Head Analysis

Wine country chicken salad vs Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wine country chicken salad

Wine country chicken salad

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl

Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
310 kcal
Energy
118 kcal
12.4g
Sugars
1.3g
23.9g
Fat
3.1g
9.7g
Protein
6.1g
1g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wine country chicken salad and Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wine country chicken salad is the more energy-dense option here, packing 192 more calories per 100g than Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wine country chicken salad contains significantly more sugar (12.4g) compared to the milder Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl (1.32g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Wine country chicken salad offers a protein boost with 9.73g per 100g, outperforming Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wine country chicken salad or Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl?

It depends on your goals. Wine country chicken salad has 310 calories, while Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl has 118 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wine country chicken salad vegan?

No, Wine country chicken salad is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wine country chicken salad and Huevos rancheros breakfast bowl?

There is a difference of 192 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.