Head-to-Head Analysis

Wine Gums vs Biscoff

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wine Gums

Wine Gums

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Biscoff

Biscoff

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
325 kcal
Energy
451.6 kcal
58.3g
Sugars
38.7g
0.4g
Fat
19.4g
4.6g
Protein
6.5g
0g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wine Gums and Biscoff side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wine Gums is the clear winner. With 127 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wine Gums contains significantly more sugar (58.3g) compared to the milder Biscoff (38.709677419355g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Biscoff is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wine Gums or Biscoff?

It depends on your goals. Wine Gums has 325 calories, while Biscoff has 451.61290322581 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wine Gums vegan?

No, Wine Gums is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wine Gums and Biscoff?

There is a difference of 127 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.