Head-to-Head Analysis

Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack vs Reese's Sticks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack

Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Reese's Sticks

Reese's Sticks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571.4 kcal
Energy
524 kcal
9.5g
Sugars
42.9g
47.6g
Fat
31g
23.8g
Protein
9.5g
1.3g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack and Reese's Sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack is the more energy-dense option here, packing 47 more calories per 100g than Reese's Sticks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack takes the lead with only 9.5238095238095g of sugar per 100g, whereas Reese's Sticks contains 42.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack offers a protein boost with 23.809523809524g per 100g, outperforming Reese's Sticks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack or Reese's Sticks?

It depends on your goals. Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack has 571.42857142857 calories, while Reese's Sticks has 524 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack vegan?

No, Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wonderful Pistachios No Shells Variety Pack and Reese's Sticks?

There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.