Head-to-Head Analysis

Wood Ear Mushrooms vs Jack links extra tender steak strips original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wood Ear Mushrooms

Wood Ear Mushrooms

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Jack links extra tender steak strips original

Jack links extra tender steak strips original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
343 kcal
Energy
285.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
17.9g
1g
Fat
3.6g
10.5g
Protein
35.7g
0.1g
Salt
4.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wood Ear Mushrooms and Jack links extra tender steak strips original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wood Ear Mushrooms is the more energy-dense option here, packing 57 more calories per 100g than Jack links extra tender steak strips original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Wood Ear Mushrooms takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Jack links extra tender steak strips original contains 17.857142857143g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wood Ear Mushrooms or Jack links extra tender steak strips original?

It depends on your goals. Wood Ear Mushrooms has 342.9732313035 calories, while Jack links extra tender steak strips original has 285.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wood Ear Mushrooms vegan?

No, Wood Ear Mushrooms is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wood Ear Mushrooms and Jack links extra tender steak strips original?

There is a difference of 57 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.