Head-to-Head Analysis

Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp vs SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp

Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT

SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
40 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
80g
Sugars
10.7g
0g
Fat
32.1g
0g
Protein
3.6g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp and SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp is the clear winner. With 496 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp contains significantly more sugar (80g) compared to the milder SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT (10.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp or SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT?

It depends on your goals. Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp has 40 calories, while SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp vegan?

No, Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wrigleys spearmint chewing gum sugar free stick rp and SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT?

There is a difference of 496 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.