Head-to-Head Analysis

Yams vs Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Yams

Yams

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced

Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
120 kcal
Energy
223 kcal
9g
Sugars
6.5g
0g
Fat
2.2g
2g
Protein
13.5g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Yams and Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Yams is the clear winner. With 103 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Yams contains significantly more sugar (9g) compared to the milder Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced (6.49g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Yams or Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced?

It depends on your goals. Yams has 120 calories, while Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced has 223 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Yams vegan?

No, Yams is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Yams and Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced?

There is a difference of 103 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.