Head-to-Head Analysis

Yams vs Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Yams

Yams

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
81.3 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
13.8g
Sugars
7.1g
0g
Fat
25g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Yams and Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Yams is the clear winner. With 419 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Yams contains significantly more sugar (13.75g) compared to the milder Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Yams or Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Yams has 81.25 calories, while Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Yams vegan?

No, Yams is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Yams and Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips?

There is a difference of 419 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.