Head-to-Head Analysis

Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce vs Cooking Stock Chicken

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce

Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cooking Stock Chicken

Cooking Stock Chicken

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
94.1 kcal
Energy
1.4 kcal
14.6g
Sugars
0.2g
0g
Fat
0g
0.6g
Protein
0.2g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce and Cooking Stock Chicken side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce is the more energy-dense option here, packing 93 more calories per 100g than Cooking Stock Chicken. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce contains significantly more sugar (14.6g) compared to the milder Cooking Stock Chicken (0.175g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cooking Stock Chicken is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce or Cooking Stock Chicken?

It depends on your goals. Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce has 94.1 calories, while Cooking Stock Chicken has 1.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce vegan?

No, Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce and Cooking Stock Chicken?

There is a difference of 93 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.