Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil vs Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil
Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil and Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil is the clear winner. With 238 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds contains 23.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil or Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds?
Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil vegan?
No, Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Yellowfin Tuna Fillets With Basil & Sundried Tomato In Olive Oil and Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds?
There is a difference of 238 calories per 100g between the two products.
