Yorkham vs M&Ms Minis, milk chocolate
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Yorkham
M&Ms Minis, milk chocolate
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Yorkham and M&Ms Minis, milk chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Yorkham is the clear winner. With 358 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Yorkham takes the lead with only 1.11111111111111g of sugar per 100g, whereas M&Ms Minis, milk chocolate contains 64g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Yorkham offers a protein boost with 21.5151515151515g per 100g, outperforming M&Ms Minis, milk chocolate in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Yorkham or M&Ms Minis, milk chocolate?
Yorkham appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Yorkham vegan?
No, Yorkham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Yorkham and M&Ms Minis, milk chocolate?
There is a difference of 358 calories per 100g between the two products.
