Head-to-Head Analysis

Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus vs Air Fried Himalayan Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus

Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Air Fried Himalayan Salt

Air Fried Himalayan Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
66.7 kcal
Energy
464.3 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
16.1g
0g
Protein
7.1g
7.5g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus and Air Fried Himalayan Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus is the clear winner. With 398 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus contains significantly more sugar (13.333333333333g) compared to the milder Air Fried Himalayan Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Air Fried Himalayan Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus or Air Fried Himalayan Salt?

It depends on your goals. Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus has 66.666666666667 calories, while Air Fried Himalayan Salt has 464.28571428571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus vegan?

No, Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Yuzu Ponzu Premium Soy Dressing With Yuzu Citrus and Air Fried Himalayan Salt?

There is a difference of 398 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.