Head-to-Head Analysis

Zanzibar Caramello Croccante vs Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Zanzibar Caramello Croccante

Zanzibar Caramello Croccante

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry

Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
568 kcal
Energy
351 kcal
42g
Sugars
35.1g
39g
Fat
9.5g
13g
Protein
5.4g
0.1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Zanzibar Caramello Croccante and Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Zanzibar Caramello Croccante is the more energy-dense option here, packing 217 more calories per 100g than Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Zanzibar Caramello Croccante contains significantly more sugar (42g) compared to the milder Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry (35.1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Zanzibar Caramello Croccante offers a protein boost with 13g per 100g, outperforming Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Zanzibar Caramello Croccante or Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry?

It depends on your goals. Zanzibar Caramello Croccante has 568 calories, while Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry has 351 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Zanzibar Caramello Croccante vegan?

No, Zanzibar Caramello Croccante is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Zanzibar Caramello Croccante and Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry?

There is a difference of 217 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.