Head-to-Head Analysis

Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips vs Tomato paste

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Tomato paste

Tomato paste

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
117 kcal
0g
Sugars
13.3g
35.7g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
3.3g
1.3g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips and Tomato paste side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 419 more calories per 100g than Tomato paste. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Tomato paste contains 13.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Tomato paste in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips or Tomato paste?

It depends on your goals. Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 536 calories, while Tomato paste has 117 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips vegan?

No, Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Zesty Jalapeño Flavored Kettle Cooked Potato Chips and Tomato paste?

There is a difference of 419 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.