Head-to-Head Analysis

Zinc vs Swedish style snack bar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Zinc

Zinc

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Swedish style snack bar

Swedish style snack bar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
420 kcal
0g
Sugars
6g
0g
Fat
22g
0g
Protein
30g
0g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Zinc and Swedish style snack bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Zinc is the clear winner. With 420 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Zinc takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Swedish style snack bar contains 6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Zinc or Swedish style snack bar?

Zinc appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Zinc vegan?

No, Zinc is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Zinc and Swedish style snack bar?

There is a difference of 420 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.