Head-to-Head Analysis

Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts vs Excellence 78% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts

Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Excellence 78% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bar

Excellence 78% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
475 kcal
Energy
567 kcal
27.5g
Sugars
16.7g
30g
Fat
46.7g
10g
Protein
10g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts and Excellence 78% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts is the clear winner. With 92 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts contains significantly more sugar (27.5g) compared to the milder Excellence 78% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bar (16.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Excellence 78% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bar is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts or Excellence 78% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bar?

It depends on your goals. Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts has 475 calories, while Excellence 78% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bar has 567 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts vegan?

No, Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Almonds, Cranberries & Macadamia Nuts and Excellence 78% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bar?

There is a difference of 92 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.