Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet vs Fudge Covered Ritz Crackers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet
Fudge Covered Ritz Crackers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet and Fudge Covered Ritz Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet is the clear winner. With 264 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fudge Covered Ritz Crackers contains 39.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet offers a protein boost with 20.4g per 100g, outperforming Fudge Covered Ritz Crackers in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet or Fudge Covered Ritz Crackers?
Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet vegan?
No, Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Atlantic Salmon, Skinless fillet and Fudge Covered Ritz Crackers?
There is a difference of 264 calories per 100g between the two products.
