Head-to-Head Analysis

Biscoff Cookies vs Pork Cracklings

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Biscoff Cookies

Biscoff Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pork Cracklings

Pork Cracklings

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
480 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
40g
Sugars
0g
20g
Fat
35.7g
4g
Protein
57.1g
1g
Salt
6.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Biscoff Cookies and Pork Cracklings side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Biscoff Cookies is the clear winner. With 91 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Biscoff Cookies contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Pork Cracklings (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pork Cracklings is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Biscoff Cookies or Pork Cracklings?

It depends on your goals. Biscoff Cookies has 480 calories, while Pork Cracklings has 571.42857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Biscoff Cookies vegan?

No, Biscoff Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Biscoff Cookies and Pork Cracklings?

There is a difference of 91 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.