Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage vs Chicken breast tenders

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken breast tenders

Chicken breast tenders

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
316 kcal
Energy
241 kcal
8.6g
Sugars
0g
20.1g
Fat
9.8g
25.9g
Protein
15.2g
2.8g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage and Chicken breast tenders side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage is the more energy-dense option here, packing 75 more calories per 100g than Chicken breast tenders. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage contains significantly more sugar (8.62g) compared to the milder Chicken breast tenders (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken breast tenders is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage offers a protein boost with 25.9g per 100g, outperforming Chicken breast tenders in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage or Chicken breast tenders?

It depends on your goals. Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage has 316 calories, while Chicken breast tenders has 241 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage vegan?

No, Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage and Chicken breast tenders?

There is a difference of 75 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.