Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies vs Sea salt and vinegar chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies

Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea salt and vinegar chips

Sea salt and vinegar chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
458 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
75g
Sugars
0g
14.6g
Fat
32.1g
4.2g
Protein
7.1g
1.3g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies and Sea salt and vinegar chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies is the clear winner. With 78 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies contains significantly more sugar (75g) compared to the milder Sea salt and vinegar chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea salt and vinegar chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies or Sea salt and vinegar chips?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies has 458 calories, while Sea salt and vinegar chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies vegan?

No, Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate Sea Salt Pretzel Bliss Rice Krispies and Sea salt and vinegar chips?

There is a difference of 78 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.