Head-to-Head Analysis

DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies vs Wicked Dark Organic Dark Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies

DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wicked Dark Organic Dark Chocolate

Wicked Dark Organic Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
483 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
44.8g
Sugars
5.7g
24.1g
Fat
48.6g
0g
Protein
11.4g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies and Wicked Dark Organic Dark Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies is the clear winner. With 88 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies contains significantly more sugar (44.8g) compared to the milder Wicked Dark Organic Dark Chocolate (5.71g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wicked Dark Organic Dark Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies or Wicked Dark Organic Dark Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies has 483 calories, while Wicked Dark Organic Dark Chocolate has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies vegan?

No, DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between DOUBLE STUF OREO Chocolate Sandwich Cookies and Wicked Dark Organic Dark Chocolate?

There is a difference of 88 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.