Head-to-Head Analysis

Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax vs Italian style tomato paste

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax

Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Italian style tomato paste

Italian style tomato paste

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
938 kcal
Energy
90.9 kcal
68.8g
Sugars
12.1g
15.6g
Fat
0g
25g
Protein
3g
1.9g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax and Italian style tomato paste side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax is the more energy-dense option here, packing 847 more calories per 100g than Italian style tomato paste. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax contains significantly more sugar (68.8g) compared to the milder Italian style tomato paste (12.121212121212g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Italian style tomato paste is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Italian style tomato paste in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax or Italian style tomato paste?

It depends on your goals. Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax has 938 calories, while Italian style tomato paste has 90.909090909091 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax vegan?

No, Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Instant Oatmeal Oats & Flax and Italian style tomato paste?

There is a difference of 847 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.