Head-to-Head Analysis

Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) vs The original swiss style muesli

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Japanese style Peanuts (unidades)

Japanese style Peanuts (unidades)

Not Vegan
VS
Package of The original swiss style muesli

The original swiss style muesli

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
374 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
30.3g
16.7g
Fat
5.6g
16.7g
Protein
11g
0.9g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) and The original swiss style muesli side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 93 more calories per 100g than The original swiss style muesli. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) takes the lead with only 13.3g of sugar per 100g, whereas The original swiss style muesli contains 30.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) offers a protein boost with 16.7g per 100g, outperforming The original swiss style muesli in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) or The original swiss style muesli?

It depends on your goals. Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) has 467 calories, while The original swiss style muesli has 374 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) vegan?

No, Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Japanese style Peanuts (unidades) and The original swiss style muesli?

There is a difference of 93 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.