Head-to-Head Analysis

Lesser Evil Space Balls vs KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lesser Evil Space Balls

Lesser Evil Space Balls

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS

KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
471 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
5.9g
Sugars
0g
20.6g
Fat
28.6g
5.9g
Protein
7.1g
1.9g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lesser Evil Space Balls and KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Lesser Evil Space Balls is the clear winner. With 65 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lesser Evil Space Balls contains significantly more sugar (5.88g) compared to the milder KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lesser Evil Space Balls or KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS?

It depends on your goals. Lesser Evil Space Balls has 471 calories, while KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lesser Evil Space Balls vegan?

No, Lesser Evil Space Balls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lesser Evil Space Balls and KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS?

There is a difference of 65 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.