Head-to-Head Analysis

M&m Pop’d vs Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of M&m Pop’d

M&m Pop’d

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple

Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464 kcal
Energy
80.8 kcal
64.3g
Sugars
14.1g
17.9g
Fat
0g
3.6g
Protein
1g
0.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing M&m Pop’d and Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

M&m Pop’d is the more energy-dense option here, packing 383 more calories per 100g than Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. M&m Pop’d contains significantly more sugar (64.3g) compared to the milder Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple (14.141414141414g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? M&m Pop’d offers a protein boost with 3.57g per 100g, outperforming Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: M&m Pop’d or Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple?

It depends on your goals. M&m Pop’d has 464 calories, while Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple has 80.808080808081 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is M&m Pop’d vegan?

No, M&m Pop’d is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between M&m Pop’d and Bold blueberry organic mixed fruit puree apple?

There is a difference of 383 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.