Head-to-Head Analysis

Maishendl Filet vs Biscoff

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Maishendl Filet

Maishendl Filet

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Biscoff

Biscoff

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
101 kcal
Energy
484 kcal
0g
Sugars
38.7g
1g
Fat
19.4g
23g
Protein
6.5g
0.5g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maishendl Filet and Biscoff side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Maishendl Filet is the clear winner. With 383 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Maishendl Filet takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Biscoff contains 38.71g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Maishendl Filet offers a protein boost with 23g per 100g, outperforming Biscoff in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maishendl Filet or Biscoff?

Maishendl Filet appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Maishendl Filet vegan?

No, Maishendl Filet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maishendl Filet and Biscoff?

There is a difference of 383 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.