Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Cranberry vs ricanelas

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate Cranberry

Milk Chocolate Cranberry

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ricanelas

ricanelas

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
437.5 kcal
63.3g
Sugars
25g
20g
Fat
14.1g
3.3g
Protein
6.3g
0.1g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Cranberry and ricanelas side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk Chocolate Cranberry is the more energy-dense option here, packing 30 more calories per 100g than ricanelas. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate Cranberry contains significantly more sugar (63.3g) compared to the milder ricanelas (25g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ricanelas is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Cranberry or ricanelas?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Cranberry has 467 calories, while ricanelas has 437.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Cranberry vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Cranberry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Cranberry and ricanelas?

There is a difference of 30 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.