Head-to-Head Analysis

Snows Clam Chowder New England Style vs Skinless & Boneless Sardines in Olive Oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Snows Clam Chowder New England Style

Snows Clam Chowder New England Style

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Skinless & Boneless Sardines in Olive Oil

Skinless & Boneless Sardines in Olive Oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
67.8 kcal
Energy
212 kcal
1.7g
Sugars
0g
1.3g
Fat
12.5g
3.4g
Protein
26.3g
1.7g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Snows Clam Chowder New England Style and Skinless & Boneless Sardines in Olive Oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Snows Clam Chowder New England Style is the clear winner. With 144 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Snows Clam Chowder New England Style contains significantly more sugar (1.69g) compared to the milder Skinless & Boneless Sardines in Olive Oil (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Skinless & Boneless Sardines in Olive Oil is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Snows Clam Chowder New England Style or Skinless & Boneless Sardines in Olive Oil?

It depends on your goals. Snows Clam Chowder New England Style has 67.8 calories, while Skinless & Boneless Sardines in Olive Oil has 212 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Snows Clam Chowder New England Style vegan?

No, Snows Clam Chowder New England Style is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Snows Clam Chowder New England Style and Skinless & Boneless Sardines in Olive Oil?

There is a difference of 144 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.