Head-to-Head Analysis

Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts vs Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts

Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT

Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
263.2 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
3.6g
Fat
0g
22.3g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts and Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts is the clear winner. With 138 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts offers a protein boost with 22.3g per 100g, outperforming Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts or Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT?

It depends on your goals. Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts has 125 calories, while Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT has 263.15789803904 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts vegan?

No, Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tyson Sliced Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts and Wrigley's Orbit Sugarfree Gum Bubblemint - 14 CT?

There is a difference of 138 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.