Whole ultra-filtered milk vs Smurfberry
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Whole ultra-filtered milk
Smurfberry
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Whole ultra-filtered milk and Smurfberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Whole ultra-filtered milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 61 more calories per 100g than Smurfberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Whole ultra-filtered milk contains significantly more sugar (2.5g) compared to the milder Smurfberry (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Smurfberry is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Whole ultra-filtered milk offers a protein boost with 5.42g per 100g, outperforming Smurfberry in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Whole ultra-filtered milk or Smurfberry?
It depends on your goals. Whole ultra-filtered milk has 62.5 calories, while Smurfberry has 1.41 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Whole ultra-filtered milk vegan?
No, Whole ultra-filtered milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Whole ultra-filtered milk and Smurfberry?
There is a difference of 61 calories per 100g between the two products.
